I’ll post the whole exchange on my Substack when I get a chance. Basically I said that the medical freedom movement seems to be led by a circular firing squad. Malone attacks the Breggins. Alexander attacks Malone. Crawford attacks, Kirsch Crawford attacks, Sage, Hanna, Berenson attacks, anybody who supports ivermectin etc. etc.. his response, which he also deleted to my comment, said that I’m paranoid and I can’t stand the thought of not having a leader for the MFM. I told him those comments were unhinged, and they were not based on any evidence.
Without saying that anyone actually *is* "controlled opposition" (that is, either 'on the payroll' or subject to blackmail), I think it's still safe (at least under the first amendment) to give an opinion that so-and-so is Acting Like they're controlled opposition.
In my opinion: Malone is acting like he's controlled opposition. How else do you explain the $25 million lawsuit against the Breggins? How do you explain that the said lawsuit does *not* include Stew Peters, who is the other obvious "controlled opposition" personality in the room? Again, I'm not making any claims of fact here, just stating my opinion.
I don't believe that Mathew Crawford is a "chaos agent" but I think he's suffering some understandable pain, considering what he says he's been through. And especially if it's true that he works 22-hour days. That sort of work schedule would "unhinge" just about anyone.
I don't see any reason to think Steve Kirsch is really a disinformation superspreader. But he's not a statistician, and he was too busy to look for a lawyer to take on Crawford's case.
Sage Hannah is hilarious. I don't think "she" is really accusing anyone of being a spook. She's just calling out other peoples' foibles in the not-a-movement.
Berenson would like his job at the NY TImes back. What more do I need to say.
I have been following Mathew Crawford's substack, and I saw your comments including this one:
"When you stop deleting my comments and stop mischaracterizing and twisting what I say I'll respond to your intimidating comment about people getting whacked."
Elsewhere in that thread, Crawford writes: "When somebody murders half your family, destroys your home, then tries to kill your spouse, I'm just guessing you won't belittling refer to "enemy-hunting"."
Do you have any idea what Crawford is talking about? Who has been murdered? I tried myself to ask Crawford about this earlier, and got no answer. His comments do indeed seem "unhinged".
I’ll post the whole exchange on my Substack when I get a chance. Basically I said that the medical freedom movement seems to be led by a circular firing squad. Malone attacks the Breggins. Alexander attacks Malone. Crawford attacks, Kirsch Crawford attacks, Sage, Hanna, Berenson attacks, anybody who supports ivermectin etc. etc.. his response, which he also deleted to my comment, said that I’m paranoid and I can’t stand the thought of not having a leader for the MFM. I told him those comments were unhinged, and they were not based on any evidence.
Without saying that anyone actually *is* "controlled opposition" (that is, either 'on the payroll' or subject to blackmail), I think it's still safe (at least under the first amendment) to give an opinion that so-and-so is Acting Like they're controlled opposition.
In my opinion: Malone is acting like he's controlled opposition. How else do you explain the $25 million lawsuit against the Breggins? How do you explain that the said lawsuit does *not* include Stew Peters, who is the other obvious "controlled opposition" personality in the room? Again, I'm not making any claims of fact here, just stating my opinion.
I don't believe that Mathew Crawford is a "chaos agent" but I think he's suffering some understandable pain, considering what he says he's been through. And especially if it's true that he works 22-hour days. That sort of work schedule would "unhinge" just about anyone.
I don't see any reason to think Steve Kirsch is really a disinformation superspreader. But he's not a statistician, and he was too busy to look for a lawyer to take on Crawford's case.
Sage Hannah is hilarious. I don't think "she" is really accusing anyone of being a spook. She's just calling out other peoples' foibles in the not-a-movement.
Berenson would like his job at the NY TImes back. What more do I need to say.
A circular firing squad, metaphorically speaking.
Hello Joel,
I have been following Mathew Crawford's substack, and I saw your comments including this one:
"When you stop deleting my comments and stop mischaracterizing and twisting what I say I'll respond to your intimidating comment about people getting whacked."
Elsewhere in that thread, Crawford writes: "When somebody murders half your family, destroys your home, then tries to kill your spouse, I'm just guessing you won't belittling refer to "enemy-hunting"."
Do you have any idea what Crawford is talking about? Who has been murdered? I tried myself to ask Crawford about this earlier, and got no answer. His comments do indeed seem "unhinged".